![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
I'll admit it: I feel somewhat self-conscious and embarrassed by being into steampunk. A lot of it is done very poorly, by the standards that I care about. But I like it. I like having a fantasy genre that focuses on my favorite technological aspects of my favorite period of history. I don't care that it is goth turned brown -- I like the goth look too, it just isn't for me. And with all due respect to Charles Stross, I really don't care that it glosses over 19th century class struggles.
Beyond it simply being an aesthetic that happens to speak to me, though, I find it all very... refreshing. The last 15 years have been very good for fandom. (Maybe too good, but that's another post.) I've enjoyed seeing the energy and excitement that has come in with every new fan-friendly media property. I've gotten into more than a few myself. But they're all properties, owned by someone. Or, worse, something. Most turn a blind-eye towards fan remix culture, but the threat is always there. They're someone else's sandbox. More creepily, being a fan for a commercial enterprise makes your enthusiasm into free advertizing. I'm rather uncomfortable with my excitement being... harvested. Particularly if we're talking about a large corporate IP owner. I'm glad that there is a business model which means big awesome media properties get made, but that doesn't make me entirely comfortable with all of the details.
Steampunk, obviously, isn't like that. It's a genre that people are getting excited about. No one owns it. No one is cynically making money from your honest devotion. There are conventions but no cannon. No lingering background threats of DMCA takedowns or copyright lawsuits if you do too much free publicity for it.
Plus, how often do you get to see an entire genre being invented? I used to think steampunk was going to be a brief fad, but now I'm not so sure. It's starting to have the feeling of a core mythos now. I wonder if this is how the explosion of Tolkien-style fantasy felt.
Beyond it simply being an aesthetic that happens to speak to me, though, I find it all very... refreshing. The last 15 years have been very good for fandom. (Maybe too good, but that's another post.) I've enjoyed seeing the energy and excitement that has come in with every new fan-friendly media property. I've gotten into more than a few myself. But they're all properties, owned by someone. Or, worse, something. Most turn a blind-eye towards fan remix culture, but the threat is always there. They're someone else's sandbox. More creepily, being a fan for a commercial enterprise makes your enthusiasm into free advertizing. I'm rather uncomfortable with my excitement being... harvested. Particularly if we're talking about a large corporate IP owner. I'm glad that there is a business model which means big awesome media properties get made, but that doesn't make me entirely comfortable with all of the details.
Steampunk, obviously, isn't like that. It's a genre that people are getting excited about. No one owns it. No one is cynically making money from your honest devotion. There are conventions but no cannon. No lingering background threats of DMCA takedowns or copyright lawsuits if you do too much free publicity for it.
Plus, how often do you get to see an entire genre being invented? I used to think steampunk was going to be a brief fad, but now I'm not so sure. It's starting to have the feeling of a core mythos now. I wonder if this is how the explosion of Tolkien-style fantasy felt.
no subject
In fact, the literary scene has been the backbone of every craze I can think of (e.g. zombies, vampires) that has significant cross-pollination with movies, video games, jewelry on Etsy, etcetera. Does this mean that literature is still the prime mover of popular culture? That's a little encouraging.
no subject
I'm not too worried about literature. With the trend over the last 10 years of more complex mass media, I think it's getting more accessible again to general audiences. It's certainly a mover of pop culture. Not sure if there will ever be a prime mover again, though, hard to see things getting less fragmented short of a widescale Collapse scenario.
no subject
no subject
no subject
gammaaetheric rays. So we've never standardized spelling.no subject
no subject
no subject
You know what I'm talking about?
no subject
no subject
no subject
By all means have fun and change the world with your standards!
no subject
no subject
Having an 'aha!' moment. I just finished up a sci-fi course where steampunk was mentioned with a passing "I don't like it because it glosses over 19th century class struggles, racism, etc." and little else - partially due to time constraints, but partially, I think, because the prof didn't want to get into that level of problematic analysis... It's nice to have a name to put to that. Thanks.
It's also really nice to see and hear from a different perspective on it! I'm really intrigued by steampunk and where it came from/where it's gonna be going, but that is unfortunately the sum total of my experience with it right now.
no subject
no subject
True of, well, everything. So you can't really escape that part.
no subject
With the internet, the explosion can now occur a lot faster and further afield. I'm thinking back to when Tolkien fans I knew met by convincing high school teachers to let 'em have a corner of a chalkboard in school and then conversing in runes (which they taught themselves) and not meeting in person 'til much later in the school year.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Of course, if one is going to critique steampunk for not recognizing class issues, one would have to make the same statement about much of fantasy not recognizing class issues of medieval settings. (Which it often doesn't--actually an issue I have with much of fantasy, that kings/queens/princes/princesses or "chosen ones" etc. should matter more than common folks.)
-B.
no subject