September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, October 20th, 2010 11:52 pm
10 infants dead in California whooping cough outbreak

Science keeps babies alive. Until your alternate system can beat its record, I really, really don't want to hear about it.
Thursday, October 21st, 2010 03:59 pm (UTC)
Yep. That's part of why I got my pertussis booster (along with tetanus and pneumonia vaccine) before I left the hospital when Michael was born.

On the veterinary side, it's called herd immunity - the higher the percentage of immune (vaccinated) individuals, the less likely you are to see a preventable disease.
Thursday, October 21st, 2010 11:52 pm (UTC)
I've always heard it referred to as herd immunity in humans, too.
Friday, October 22nd, 2010 01:53 am (UTC)
I suspect using "herd immunity" goes back to the veterinarians. IIRC, something like "community resistance" is used for people (since they don't usually run in herds :))
Friday, October 22nd, 2010 03:55 am (UTC)
I've always heard it called herd immunity in humans, too -- but I was a microbiologist; I'm guessing doctors and people with a sense of PR might use better terminology than epidemiologists.
Friday, October 22nd, 2010 12:06 am (UTC)
IIRC, it's particularly important wrt infants. They can't /get/ immunizations for a bunch of things - I think whooping cough is one of them. So they /have/ to depend on herd immunity to protect them from it. Choosing not to get immunized is NOT an individual choice.
Friday, October 22nd, 2010 03:59 am (UTC)
It's a type of externality problem. By not getting your kids immunized you raise the risk of other kids dying horribly of a preventable disease. But the kicker is you do lower the risk of your kids dying from complications from the vaccine -- which *does* happen, although at a much lower rate than the anti-vaccination crowd thinks.
Of course, if your kid gets the disease for which s/he wasn't vaccinated, there's a roughly 1000 times higher of permanent damage as an after-effect of disease than of vaccination. But *if* herd immunity is high, it's a rational tactic to dump the risk on other people's children.
Friday, October 29th, 2010 10:33 pm (UTC)
Rational, but not moral.