gfish: (Default)
gfish ([personal profile] gfish) wrote2010-09-22 08:42 pm

You Will

While I'm on an early 90s nostalgia kick, and since a Twitter exchange today reminded me I've meant to do this for awhile, let's revist the AT&T "You Will" commercials.



As far as I'm concerned, these are iconic commercials. Maybe I was just the right demographic at the right time, but they sank deep, deep into my brain, becoming one of the main standards by which the future was judged. And they're a perfect snapshot of the futurism of the day, caught in an awkward transition from an 80s vision of a dirty CRT future to the happy consumer, information-centric view we're still working from.

They're even pretty good in terms of predictions.

"Have you ever sent a fax from the beach?" Um, yuck, who would want to? Typical mistake of assuming new tech will slavishly mimic the old tech. But one could do this if they wanted to, and the much more socially acceptable act of sending an email from a tablet or laptop certainly fulfills the intent.

"Have you ever crossed the country without stopping to ask directions?" GPS renderings aren't quite as fly-through-3D yet, but the interface shown is pretty stupid. I'll take the Google Maps/StreetView enabled GPS directions on my Android over that any day.

"Have you ever borrowed a book from thousands of miles away?" Borrow? Again, stuck in the paradigms of the past. I can certainly have access to a wide range of books, and better yet, they aren't silly video of a book with its pages turning, but searchable text. There are a lot of books missing still, but that's due to legal issues and not technological limitations.

"Have you ever paid a toll without slowing down?" Very standard most places with tolls, and you don't have to swipe your credit card each time either. Tollbooth architecture isn't quite that cool yet, though.

"Have you ever bought concert tickets from a cash machine?" This is almost as funny as the fax one. Why would I want to do that at an ATM? I can do that from my phone, from every computer I sit down at. We've not only met the goal, we've done it a way that is roughly 1000x times better.

"Have you ever attended a meeting in your bare feet?" and "Have you ever learned special things from far-away places?" and "Have you ever tucked your baby in from a phone booth?" Yeah, we have videoconferencing -- and no one really bothers. My head would have exploded, had I known. Also: phone booths, lol. Also also, most people I know could attend meetings in bare feet in person if they really wanted to. Not having been a professional in 1994, I don't know if this is actually new or not.

"Have you ever opened doors with the sound of your voice?" We fail this one. I mean, I could set it up if I wanted to, but we're a long way from residential use of electronic locks, much less biometric ones. And that's probably just as well.

"Have you ever carried your medical history in your wallet?" Well, the US is 10-15 years behind the rest of world when it comes to electronic medical records. Of course, the commercial isn't clear if this is a universal system or not, so it depends where you live. Pretty big fail all around, safe to say.

"Have you ever watched the movie you wanted to the minute you wanted to?" We've managed this even better than the book one, since movie piracy is far more comprehensive than book piracy. But Netflix streaming is close. A bit of extra work using Bittorrent, and you're there.

Overall, pretty good. But not without flaws. Most obviously, our devices are far, far better. They didn't get cell phones/mobile tech at all -- they still have payphones! The only mobile device we see is a tablet that sends pretend paper over fax for some reason. They missed being able to carry all the music you own around with you at all times. They missed the average person having a device that can (incidentally!) record and edit and upload video at any where, any time.

Worse, everything seems to be done with giant centralized systems, which would suck. This is the future without net neutrality. AT&T might think to invent ATM ticket sales, but it would never come up with Craigslist or IM or Twitter or YouTube or Bittorrent or Wikipedia or Chatroulette or any a million crazy, insane projects. The You Will future doesn't have lolcats, it has a daily joke automatically faxed to your refrigerator. There are no RSS feeds, but you can read your local newspaper using your dedicated Newspaperotron 5000 -- at least until the Newspaperotron 6000 is released next month. It doesn't have webcomics, it has the Family Circus beamed in fake-3D onto your CRT virtual reality headset for 50 cents a day. You Will is not binary compatible with any other future.

I also find it interesting how often legal/IP issues came up when I was writing my mini reviews above. That, above all else, is something I think we all missed. The impact of digital communication on IP has been the real singularity of the last 15 years. That's where futurism becomes real science fiction, looking at the feedback of how technology changes societies, and how societies choose to implement technology. We're left living in what is, by any objective standard, a bizarre world that is post-IP in just about every practical way, except legally. You can get a copy of anything you want, except when a political party in Sweden fails to get a seat in parliament and the server is taken down. You can download all the music you ever want for free, except most people just pay because it's cheap and easy. (And when you do download, it's easier to download the entire discography of the artist than a single song.) We're more cyberpunk than Gibson ever dreamed.

[identity profile] springheel-jack.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
I liked those "ride the light" ads from qwest, where the protagonist encounters the celestial jukebox for the first time at, apparently, a motel 6. Didn't they have willem defoe?

[identity profile] gfish.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
Hrm, I don't remember commercials going with that slogan, just the hideous service problems with my Qwest DSL at that time. Ride the blight!

[identity profile] peteralway.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
Funny thing about openning doors. They just put a lock on the door to the part-time faculty office that responds to the proximity of part-time faculty ID cards. if they lowered it about two feet, I wouldn't have to take my wallet out of my back pocket to open the door. I'm reminded of a similar system where I worked ca. 1990 where the more athletic employees opened doors by jumping up and pointing their butts at the card reader. So I guess that was old hat even then.

[identity profile] pielology.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
The card readers on Seattle buses are pretty close to butt height, but I never see people trying. Maybe because there's less room to maneuver, and failure is much more embarrassing with all the people present.

[identity profile] tithonium.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 05:29 am (UTC)(link)
Back when I had monthly passes, I'd slot-punch them and put them on my retracting badgeholder with my prox badges. In theory, you had to slide them thru the slot, but I learned early on that they don't actually care. Let them see it, and off you go. The orca is actually /less/ convenient in that regard. Also because you can't slot punch them (I haven't seen anybody posting diagrams of there the antenna is, tho I did see someone dissolve the card so they could put the works into their cellphone case). I've seen some people manage to keep their orca in their wallet, but it doesn't always seem to work. And I'd be too worried about falling backwards down the stairs to try the buttpass maneuver.

[identity profile] samildanach.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 06:52 am (UTC)(link)
... I do this.

[identity profile] vixyish.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 07:09 am (UTC)(link)
The bus ones don't actually read through a wallet very well. I read on the bus and tend to hold my Orca card in the same hand as my bookmark. I couldn't get the reader to read through my paperback.

[identity profile] pielology.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 08:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I hold my wallet to the reader, but yeah, I have to get it fairly close.
ext_24913: (lain)

[identity profile] cow.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
What amused me, watching these videos (before reading your commentary), was how many of those were true, within a margin of error -- as long as it was something AT&T wouldn't do. GPS, electronic tolls, ebooks, etc. are all here and even better than what we see there. But anything involving phones, phone booths, communications, etc.? Not so much.

So, good job, AT&T. The world brought us many of these things, but you had no part in any of it.

[identity profile] springheel-jack.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
That iteration of AT&T doesn't even really exist anymore.

[identity profile] tithonium.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
I've been kind of amused about that.. The giant falls and breaks into smaller and smaller pieces, until finally the last piece is absorbed into another company. Very sad.

[identity profile] tnarg42.livejournal.com 2010-09-24 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
...Absorbed by a company that was one of its children, no less...

[identity profile] tithonium.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 05:33 am (UTC)(link)
That's been most of my point when I've been talking about it. AT&T was all "oh, look at the awesome stuff we're gonna do for you!" and, um, well, no. Mind you, some of the bits and pieces probably /did/ come out of bell labs to one degree or another. But still, the whole ad campaign is one of the biggest - to my mind - examples of a big company saying "look how cool we are!" and then completely and utterly failing to deliver.

[identity profile] ljtourist.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
That is an exceedingly apt description of AT&T/Bell Labs, as well as Lucent. I have some amazing stories in that regard (like how AT&T could have had wireless ethernet years before anyone except that "who would want to read email on their porch?"), but this margin is too small to contain them.

[identity profile] sistawendy.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
I remember those ads well. They were iconic.

As for the idiotic interfaces, remember who makes ads: ad men, who are all about visual pop. When you're talking about the future, you can get away with a lot of good-looking fantasy. The technologist of the day could and soon did do better.

And as for the monolith worship, remember who commissioned and signed off on the ads: suits, whose thoughts & livelihoods came from the monolit.

[identity profile] tithonium.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
My big issue there is that there isn't /one/ opposite of monopoly... There's distribution, but there's also balkanization. And we got the wrong one.

I'm definitely happy AT&T /didn't/ bring us all our new technology, 'cause yeah, we've probably got a lot better technology. But at the cost of interoperability.

Mind you, Google doesn't always manage it. Tho, I suppose one has to wonder if that's intentional to /avoid/ (more) monopoly complaints.

Well, anyway.

[identity profile] samildanach.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 07:04 am (UTC)(link)
I'm a bit sad about the loss of payphones. I mean, I'm not crying over their commercial obsolescence, but among other things they're a more reliable emergency backup comms system than a cell system crashing under the load of everyone texting about the earthquake.

[identity profile] vixyish.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 07:12 am (UTC)(link)
I dunno; don't land lines fuck up just as badly under the weight of all the calls in that kind of disaster?

[identity profile] samildanach.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Good question; I don't know. My impression has been that exchange and trunk infrastructure is pretty overbuilt with respect to demand, while edge wireless is routinely run much closer to its limit.

[identity profile] grinninfoole.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 07:33 am (UTC)(link)
One reason to 'send a fax from the beach' (i.e. refer to technology that you might well suspect will be gone in 20 years)? Most people in the early 90s knew what a fax was; not so email.
Edited 2010-09-23 07:34 (UTC)

[identity profile] tylik.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 01:56 pm (UTC)(link)
We video-conference all the time.

I hear it's also big with grandparents...

[identity profile] hpapillon.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
And family living on different continents.

[identity profile] ilmarinen.livejournal.com 2010-09-24 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
Yes! My friend who went off to Granada for med school skypes back to read his kid to sleep (vidoeconf). They also skype with his parents who live in Fiji. Videoconferencing is big with some folks.

-B.