September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, March 30th, 2010 03:46 pm
I've been seeing this article being passed around quite a bit the last few days: Isn't Sinead O’Connor Overdue A Massive, Groveling Apology From Absolutely Everybody?

It raises some excellent points, none of which I want to get into here. Mostly, it just made me think of watching that episode of SNL when it happened, and how completely clueless I was about popular culture at the time. I became media aware fairly at a fairly late age, being the typical reclusive geek all my life. SNL was one of the shows I consciously watched not so much because I liked it, but because I knew I needed to start understanding references better. I wasn't even really paying attention when she ripped up the photo, since the music guests usually bored me. I mostly remember being a bit confused about why Sandra Day O'Connor was singing on SNL. Yes, I confused the singer for the supreme court justice. I didn't even recognize the photo at the time, I didn't realize what had happened until news stories about it the next couple of days. As an obnoxiously militant little atheist, I mostly just thought it was all pretty cool. I didn't even pay attention to the why she had done it -- I think I thought it was some Ireland Protestant/Catholic thing.

So, yeah, I guess my main response boils down to: I used to be a real dork.
Tuesday, March 30th, 2010 10:55 pm (UTC)
I didn't know it was about child molestation either. I thought it was was just a cheap, wacky stunt. That tells you something about the quality of the reporting that went on about it, I think.
Wednesday, March 31st, 2010 12:37 am (UTC)
It was more about abortion rights and her contention that the Pope's stance on contraception amounted to violence against women, I believe.
Wednesday, March 31st, 2010 12:26 pm (UTC)
Which it does.

Anyway, even minus the child sex abuse scandal I don't get this idea that *anyone* should be immune to having their picture torn up. If someone wants to tear up a picture of me, well, why not? A picture of the President, or Galleleo--okay, sure. The pope? Why should the pope be exempt?

Regarding dorkism I hadn't even heard about this until I read your post.