September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Sunday, March 7th, 2010 07:18 pm
Just saw a neat link talking about Neanderthal cloning. And I know this is my neophile, technocratic side talking, but my only response to the idea is an immediate "do it do it do it!"

Caveats: Assuming we have figured out the cloning of large mammals and have worked our way up through chimps with a high confidence of success. Obviously making deformed babies that die within hours of birth is bad. But that's just a technical problem which will be fixed eventually. At that point... why not? I really don't find the other arguments persuasive. The kids won't fit in? That was the argument a justice of the peace in Louisiana used last month to deny a marriage permit to an interracial couple! The fact that we won't learn about native Neanderthal culture is both stunningly obvious and irrelevant. There is still so much we could learn about their capabilities. Really, the suggestion that we clone a bunch and put them in a little paleolithic enclave is the most revolting "solution" in the article. What an ugly idea, forcing sentients to live a squalid life under the excuse of keeping them "natural".
Monday, March 8th, 2010 08:02 pm (UTC)
See, the hypothetical I keep thinking about is a human fetus with a fatal genetic disorder that is saved by some crazy experimental gene therapy. Would doing a longterm study to see how this affects them as they grow up be a horrible violation of ethics? Giving them some psychological tests and MRIs before they're of the age to consent doesn't seem particularly questionable to me -- that's what their legal guardian is for, to make those calls.