plunging in

[gfish]

I know I should stay clear of Amazonfail, but I just want to say that a publisher which can't make a profit selling $9 etexts (or $5, or $2) deserves to go bankrupt. If amortized editing and design costs are really the lion's share of a physical book, the system is deeply, deeply broken.

(Even applying design costs to the etext version is largely ridiculous. How much design work does an etext need? I'd prefer it as a raw text file anyway, but a LaTeX-generated PDF would also be just fine as well. The only reason for fancy design in the first place is to catch people's attention in a store. Etext selection and browsing is nothing like that, so why bother with it in the first place? Tradition? Snob factor? Anything that can't be seen in the scaled down image of the book cover in an Amazon listing is a complete waste of money.)

I remain unconvinced of the long-term viability of selling data as a business model. But if you want to find a way for authors to make money, don't make it even harder by trying to defend these dinosaurs at the same time.

Comments

[damiana-swan.livejournal.com]

*wry grins* I know people who do free editing for their friends, too. There are a few exceptions, but in general, free editing is worth what you pay for it. I've seen more than one case where the author had to fix problems put in by their editing friends, and spent hours and hours doing it.

Personally, I think the "you have to sell your work to a large publishing house in order to get published" model is about to blow away on the winds. Unfortunately, it's actively crumbling and we don't quite have anything set up to replace it yet ... but we're working on it! The model we used to create Ravens actually worked quite well ... but it was a benefit, and it didn't involve paying anyone for their work. We want a model that will do that, too!