September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, September 30th, 2009 10:51 pm
Those ideas of promoting myself as a builder of improbable devices? No longer just random thoughts. I decided to take a spare domain of mine and set up Attoparsec: Custom props and gadgets. The Google AdWords campaign just went live!

Next step is to work on more projects to showcase on the site. But I won't be able to really get into that until I'm back into Seattle. So... back to the thesis mines for now.
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 06:09 am (UTC)
I'm really glad you found something more maintainable to do with Attoparsec.
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 06:10 am (UTC)
There was no way I was going to throw away a domain THAT good. :)
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 06:32 am (UTC)
wow, Google recognizes it as: 1 attoParsec = 3.08568025 centimeters
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 06:34 am (UTC)
That's the joke, it's basically a glorified inch. I'll have to make business cards with an attoparsec ruler along one side.
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 06:43 am (UTC)
We will do good product photos of your stuff when you return. It will be good. :)
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 06:57 am (UTC)
Awesome.

Also?

Attoparsec is the pretentious brainchild of Matthew Dockrey, a dilettante with dreams of being a polymath. Agonizingly close to finishing his M.Sc. in computer science, he is starting to think there should be more to his life than the computer industry. Hence this site.


<3
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 07:04 am (UTC)
Perhaps I can talk to you about constructing an analog synth?
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 07:33 am (UTC)
Yeah, that could be a cool project. Not something I have any experience with, but I'm game! We'd need to hash out exactly what features you'd want, it all looks very mix-and-match in the searches I'm doing.
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 07:56 am (UTC)
The basic things one wants to do with an analog synth are either nerdily subtle or entirely trivial, so starting with a kit from PAiA and getting a feel for it is generally pretty workable. You can add new filters and strange routings on a whim, and swap out components for slightly different ones with mildly different characteristics to refine sound in subtle ways.
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 08:40 pm (UTC)
Hmm...I know a certain fiddler who is looking for some sort of analog synth that fits in a hat and is controlled by facial actuators so she can simultaneously be fashionably attired for the mad hatter's tea party at OVFF and know what different facial expressions sound like.

Well, OK, I don't think she's looking real hard for one.
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 08:46 pm (UTC)
That... would definitely be an interesting project. I suspect one would need to wear sticky EMG electrodes in order to get reliable readings on facial expressions. I'd start to be worried about space to fit it into a hat -- would it absolutely need to be analog?
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 09:32 pm (UTC)
Or simply mechanical pushrods adhered to the skin whose other ends move past photocells to detect motion...

The particular technology was never specified. I think the only requirements were that it be wearable as a hat and that it be playable by the wearer changing facial expressions.
Thursday, October 1st, 2009 10:17 pm (UTC)
I wonder if one could modify one of the bluetooth-laser-projection-keyboard-widgets or implement similar... in eyesafe IR for bonus points.
Friday, October 2nd, 2009 12:55 am (UTC)
I was thinking about multiple cameras building a topographic map of the face. It seems less intrusive than electrodes.
Friday, October 2nd, 2009 12:59 am (UTC)
Theoretically, that's not a solved problem in computer vision. In this case you could probably fake it, since you aren't trying to scan in an actor's face for CGI or anything that precise.

I just think that, if you're going to have a hat-mounted, face-controlled synth, then some EMG electrodes only add to the effect.
Friday, October 2nd, 2009 08:57 pm (UTC)
What do you like about Newcomen that you don't like about Watt?
Friday, October 2nd, 2009 09:06 pm (UTC)
He actually did invent the first (successful, useful) steam engine, instead of just being mythologized as such. He also was the victim of terribly oppressive intellectual property laws, instead of the instigator. My real ire is saved for Thomas Savery, but no one has heard of him.
Friday, October 2nd, 2009 09:28 pm (UTC)
Oh, OK. I've heard of Savery, and he was a tool. To be fair to Watt, he was a real inventor and innovator, and he made a genuinely more efficient engine (actually, series of engines) than Newcomen's.
Friday, October 2nd, 2009 09:31 pm (UTC)
Sure, Watt had real technical merit. He did actual engineering, while Newcomen was more of a hacker. I'm comfortable where my loyalties lie. :)
Friday, October 2nd, 2009 09:38 pm (UTC)
Sure, I was just trying to tease out exactly what distinctions you were making. Watt was a talented and productive engineer, but he was also a professional who got partner and made a serious business of steam engine production.

What you want to do with Attoparsec seems firmly unserious, and only barely a business.

btw, is one inch really 1 trillionth of 4.1 light years?
Friday, October 2nd, 2009 09:45 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure I'd say it was unserious, more that I recognize that this is not something I can devote myself to full time at the moment, nor something that has a high chance of success. It's certainly not a business, but it's the groundwork for a possible business later. The only way to get somewhere you want to be is start moving in that direction...

Atto- is 10-18 or one quintillionth. (One millionth of one trillionth.) And yeah, it works out to be about 3 centimeters.