Huh, wow. I guess I had the ability to generate impressive comment numbers all along! I promise I won't use this power for evil. Back to complaining about grad school and updates on silly side-projects.
Kind of how I felt when all my posts generated 1-2 comments, and then I made a throwaway post about the LJ election and got 95. Wait what? (Ketchup cake? 40.)
I won't have anything new on that front until I've picked up packages in Seattle this weekend, and then a couple days to actually DO something with the new parts. :)
I hadn't heard about the term until neuro42 complained about it in caladri's LJ. Is it fairly new, or perhaps an old term gaining a more widespread use?
Fairly new, yeah. I first saw it... 4 years ago, maybe? I have no idea when it was coined, could have been decades ago. Unless you follow trans issues, you'd never come across it.
Oh wow, I hadn't noticed that thread before (it happened after I read the post). That makes last night's thread idiocy make so much more sense (in, well, a relative way).
I'm not sure how old the term is, but it's definitely gaining more widespread use. A few years or so?
No, but I Have The Technology: the OED gives '1974 D. CORDELL in Rep. First National TV.TS Conf. 16 There is a tendency among trans-gender people to encourage each other. This precludes the very careful self-analysis which must take place in everyone who is proposing to undergo this therapy.' and '1983 K. E. STUART Uninvited Dilemma iii. 25 Gender conditions are quite different from sexual conditions or sexual preferences. The word transsexual is somewhat misleading, because the word sexual is incorporated into the term. Perhaps the word ‘transgender’ would have been a more suitable term.'
(n.b. 'cisgender' is not in the OED at all, its date is from wikipedia)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm not sure how old the term is, but it's definitely gaining more widespread use. A few years or so?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(n.b. 'cisgender' is not in the OED at all, its date is from wikipedia)
no subject