September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 09:13 am
Huh, wow. I guess I had the ability to generate impressive comment numbers all along! I promise I won't use this power for evil. Back to complaining about grad school and updates on silly side-projects.
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 04:23 pm (UTC)
Not to worry, other people have the propagation of evil already cornered.
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 04:40 pm (UTC)
Kind of how I felt when all my posts generated 1-2 comments, and then I made a throwaway post about the LJ election and got 95. Wait what? (Ketchup cake? 40.)
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 05:55 pm (UTC)
You got a "LOL" out of [livejournal.com profile] jwz. That is an impressive commenting superpower.
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 05:58 pm (UTC)
A purely sarcastic "LOL", but it was one nonetheless. Heh.
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 06:09 pm (UTC)
The form was sarcastic, but I think the intent was sincere. That's how I took it anyway.
ivy: (grey hand-drawn crow)
[personal profile] ivy
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 06:03 pm (UTC)
It's true. Post a long, thoughtful philosophical argument? Two comments. Post something off the cuff about your cat? 83280183 comments.
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 06:04 pm (UTC)
This is the internet. We don't read words here. >:3
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 07:31 pm (UTC)
Pretty much.
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 05:45 pm (UTC)
Hurray for updates on silly side projects! Those are great, even if I don't often have anything useful to add.
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 07:35 pm (UTC)
I won't have anything new on that front until I've picked up packages in Seattle this weekend, and then a couple days to actually DO something with the new parts. :)
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 07:31 pm (UTC)
I hadn't heard about the term until [livejournal.com profile] neuro42 complained about it in [livejournal.com profile] caladri's LJ. Is it fairly new, or perhaps an old term gaining a more widespread use?
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 07:35 pm (UTC)
Fairly new, yeah. I first saw it... 4 years ago, maybe? I have no idea when it was coined, could have been decades ago. Unless you follow trans issues, you'd never come across it.
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 07:58 pm (UTC)
Oh wow, I hadn't noticed that thread before (it happened after I read the post). That makes last night's thread idiocy make so much more sense (in, well, a relative way).

I'm not sure how old the term is, but it's definitely gaining more widespread use. A few years or so?
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 09:44 pm (UTC)
Surprisingly, it's attested at least back to 1994, but yeah, it's grown in popularity of late.
Friday, July 24th, 2009 12:15 am (UTC)
Primarily due to Serano's "Whipping Girl", which reached an audience beyond the trans community and their close partners, istr.
Friday, July 24th, 2009 05:46 am (UTC)
Wow. 15 years old. Do you happen to know offhand when "transgender" was first attested?
Friday, July 24th, 2009 05:55 am (UTC)
No, but I Have The Technology: the OED gives '1974 D. CORDELL in Rep. First National TV.TS Conf. 16 There is a tendency among trans-gender people to encourage each other. This precludes the very careful self-analysis which must take place in everyone who is proposing to undergo this therapy.' and '1983 K. E. STUART Uninvited Dilemma iii. 25 Gender conditions are quite different from sexual conditions or sexual preferences. The word transsexual is somewhat misleading, because the word sexual is incorporated into the term. Perhaps the word ‘transgender’ would have been a more suitable term.'

(n.b. 'cisgender' is not in the OED at all, its date is from wikipedia)
Friday, July 24th, 2009 06:03 am (UTC)
Thanks!