September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009 11:52 pm
People have problems with the term cisgender? That's... I don't know what that is. Quite an impressive knapsack, I guess.
Friday, July 24th, 2009 07:10 am (UTC)
That's not correct. Even if you posit a 'gender binary', you cannot be on the same or opposite side *of the concept of gender itself*, and that's the only sensible thing cis- can mean.

Friday, July 24th, 2009 07:26 am (UTC)
But "cis-gender-binary" would be OK? Or cis-gender-assignment-at-birth? (I mean, assuming I sorted the hyphens correctly)
Friday, July 24th, 2009 07:31 am (UTC)
No! No matter what model you think of gender using, there's none in which it makes sense to be on this side of it or the opposite side of it! I don't understand why you don't see this.
Friday, July 24th, 2009 07:34 am (UTC)
It totally makes sense to be on the opposite side of the gender binary from the side you were assigned at birth! And that concept elides precisely as much cultural context as the idea that "cisalpine" refers to the southern side of the Alps, which it does. I don't understand why you don't see this.
Friday, July 24th, 2009 07:34 am (UTC)
... and by "concept" I meant "usage", there.