September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, April 23rd, 2009 03:26 pm
I just had a confluence of several (silly) chains of thought.

For a long time, I've wondered how one could recognize if one's reality had been altered by time travel. I've also, occasionally, worked on a mental list of revenue streams I could easily take advantage of should I find myself marooned in the recent past, particularly the early 90s. (Domain names to buy, technologies to invent, etc.) Finally, Google has struck me for a long time as being something out of an SF novel. They do too much that is absolutely central to modern life, and they're just too good at it. Monopolies of talent and quality shouldn't exist in real life.

I assume you can see where I'm going with this: Larry Page and Sergey Brin are anachronisms, or have had access to non-causal information.

Well, more power to them. Having settled this, though, what does it tell us? When did they originally come from? (From before YouTube_prime became popular, otherwise Google Video would have been better. But when was that?) What can we deduce about the original timeline? I'm starting to find their increasing interest in space travel somewhat ominous...
Saturday, April 25th, 2009 01:47 am (UTC)
"had access to non-causal information"

In retrospect, I don't know what's so hard about that phrase, but it's exactly what I need to describe tampering with history in a way that's indistinguishable from time travel, yet violates no laws of cause and effect.

The idea (borrowing from BSG) is that all this has happened before, and will happen again. If you grok correctly how this moment fits into the fabric of history, you can write your own ticket locally, while totally ruining someone else's day.