Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 12:19 am
I just finished reading the revised 2000 edition of Revolution in Time. (I've been generally obsessed with mechanical clocks and their manufacture recently, but that's another post.) Fun book, though it focused a lot more on the economics and not enough on the technology. It ends with a rather melancholy examination of the triumph of quartz watches over mechanical movements. The funny thing is, in the 9 years since then, watches themselves have become an endangered species. How many people under 35 wear one anymore? Everyone just uses their cellphone now.

I've worn a watch most of my life at this point. (Literally -- I pretty much only take them off for showers and machining.) I don't think I'll stop -- I'm obsessive-compulsive enough that I like checking the time very regularly, and that's too much of a pain with a cellphone.

The first watch that I remember owning was a fancy multifunction digital when I was 9 or so. I'm not sure what model it was, possibly a Casio G-Shock? I loved that watch so much. Black plastic with red control buttons, all all kinds of timer and alarm modes to play with. It made an excellent prop for playing time travel games at recess.

For a while in high school I proved myself very ahead of my times by relying on my HP 48G graphing calculator (the PDA of its era) as a watch. That worked okay, since I did actually carry it everywhere, just another item in my huge coat/vest pockets. But I ended up wearing a watch again soon enough after finding an old self-winding Timex that used to be my grandfather's in a junk drawer. I loved the idea of a self-winding watch (and still do!), so I started to wear it. It lasted me for many years before getting cranky and then freezing entirely. The case had started to seriously wear away in places at that point, so I figured its time had come. I still have the habit of shaking my wrist occasionally, to get the self-winding action going.

I've been wearing my current Falcon Combat 24 hour for about 6 years now, which has proved to be a great watch. I particularly love the confused look people get when they try to read it. The black has worn away on all the edges, exposing the aluminum beneath, but the face itself remains unscratched in spite of some very energetic collisions. It's too bad they don't make them anymore. It was already the only nice-yet-affordable 24 hour watch I could find back then.
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 09:30 am (UTC)
The sexiest watch in the universe:

Image (http://dbsi.org/dist/cosmonaute/)

24hr, self-winding, and a circular slide rule. And chronograph. How much better can it get?

Too bad it costs two months' rent. At least I got to try one on when I was in Geneva. It's just as sexy in person.

Not that I've worn a watch in 15+ years... but still.
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 01:33 pm (UTC)
I hate to disagree with anyone who loves watches, but this is the sexiest watch around:

Image

Breguet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breguet_(watch)) tourbillon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourbillon) FTW

Actually, I'm autofriends with anyone who loves watches and having a favorite, any favorite, marks you as top drawer in my book.

Right now I rock the Armani Classic with a stopwatch (gift from TheWife):
Image
I've never used a stopwatch as much as I do now that I have one ready at my fingertips. I kick myself for not having had one sooner.

Edited 2009-02-24 01:33 pm (UTC)
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 06:59 pm (UTC)
If I was going to go for a really fancy mechanical watch, I'm not sure I could resist a multi-axis tourbillon (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWdlPMQlig4). But that definitely is a beautiful watch.
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 07:04 pm (UTC)
Ooooooooooooh. That is nice.
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 07:46 pm (UTC)
Tourbillons are pretty awesome, but I just can't get behind 12-hour time.
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 07:56 pm (UTC)
Also, the Cosmonaute is certified for manned spaceflight! :)

(Sadly, I just looked at more recent prices; now it's up to about four month's rent -- which wouldn't be so bad except that my rent is twice what it was the last time I checked the price. Sigh...)
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 01:53 pm (UTC)
I wear a nurse's watch because I hate having things on my hands while typing, and I spend most of my life typing. So no rings, no bracelets, no wristwatches.

I love my dangly watch but sometimes when I'm out looking at really gorgeous pocket watches, I wish there were a few more options to go around in the upside-down-dangly-watch department... My stylistic expression is limited!
Wednesday, February 25th, 2009 05:35 pm (UTC)
Oh nifty. I always wanted one of those if I could find a pretty one that I liked. I never knew that's what that style was called. (Makes sense tho.)
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 03:28 pm (UTC)
*sigh* I just uncovered my copy of a paper clock book (http://www.amazon.com/Make-Your-Working-Paper-Clock/dp/0060910666)

about the same time as stumbling onto downloadable pdf paper clock (http://guru2.karakasa.com/pendulum_clock/pcp_e.html).
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 05:48 pm (UTC)
I did one of those once (http://www.cyphertext.net/images/Erato/1054329957-pv.JPG). Fun project! Though it never ran for more than about 5 minutes at a time...
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 04:53 pm (UTC)
Someday, someone will make a nice, clean, well-designed 24-hour skeletonized automatic in a women's case size, one which is just a watch without a ton of extra features (ok, a perpetual calendar and a second time zone would be ok, but a watch, not a chronometer). Hopefully, I will then be in a position to buy one, whether or not the price is sane.
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 05:12 pm (UTC)
I love watches, but really find them too annoying to wear. Part of my overall trend to never wearing jewelry of any kind. The problem with the HP48 was that it kept really lousy time.

-B.
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 05:51 pm (UTC)
Man, 24 hour analog faces just seem so hard to read. Not that your watch isn't very pretty, but a digital 24-hr watch seems more practical. (...and not that practical needs to be your goal either I suppose. :) )

I gave up on wearing my watch when I realized the only thing I used it for that couldn't be replaced by something else I already carried with me was preventing me from losing my wedding ring - I had the habit of only taking my watch and ring off together, and putting the ring on the watch band. So it was a glorified keychain. Meanwhile I always have two other timepieces on my person (cellphone, pedometer) and unless I'm on the bus or walking, another 2 or 3 or more in easy reach - wall clock, laptop, work computer, alarm clock, microwave, oven, thermostat... ubiquitous clock functions sort of make a watch hard to justify.

I like the watch better for checking time, but I can't stand to type or play music while I'm wearing it, which covers my day job and most of my at-home time, so it's too annoying to get in the habit of looking at my wrist for the time and then be thwarted. So now I just want to make a fuzzy ring clip I can maybe attach to my belt loop.
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 07:01 pm (UTC)
Hee, I do the same thing with my wedding ring.
Wednesday, February 25th, 2009 06:09 am (UTC)
I sorta regret that I don't actually wear watches much anymore. I have my great mini collection of automatic swatches. (I decided that if I was going to get into collecting watches etc., I should try to contain myself to an affordable version.) Even as mass-produced "cheap" consumer goods, the mechanical movements on the are very pretty.

-B.
Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 01:23 am (UTC)
I'm still busy trying to figure out how I can make a watch pocket for everything that I wear or come up with another solution for my pocket watch!