September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Monday, February 6th, 2006 02:23 pm
I'm not a astrophysicist or anything, but am I the only one who finds the whole dark matter thing rather dubious? It just smells of hand-waving kludge to me. Our observations don't match our calculations, so 95% of the universe must be made of invisible matter that only interacts with the rest of us through gravity? The universe is certainly a very odd place, but I just can't get over the feeling that this is the luminiferous aether all over again.
Tuesday, February 7th, 2006 12:27 am (UTC)
I feel a whole lot better about dark matter than I do about dark energy.

And while dark matter is a pretty vague concept, at least the name suggest that it's more of a question than an answer. A reasonable shorthand for "we don't know what's there but as far as we can tell there must be something." I think if it had a fancy latin or greek name or an acronym, I'd feel more that it was a deceptive answer. If someone called it "Umbratonium," it would sound a whole lot more like someone was hiding their ignorance.
ivy: (findruinna)
[personal profile] ivy
Tuesday, February 7th, 2006 01:05 am (UTC)
[laughs at "umbratonium"] Not to mention that that sounds like a really heavy atom, which could lead to all kinds of unfortunate assumptions.
Tuesday, February 7th, 2006 01:10 am (UTC)
Well other candidates are Necronium, Occultonium, and Cryptonium--I thought Umbratonium was the least loaded of the shadowy names I could come up with.
Tuesday, February 14th, 2006 04:56 am (UTC)
I'll second that.

"Dark matter" as I understand it is a slang term for the as yet unknown answer to the question "Why does everything really big move as if it were a lot more massive than we observe it to be?"

Planets and non-glowy stuff was a first suggestion, but doesn't account for nearly enough mass- you run in to problems where as the proposed density of cold stuff increases to fit the required mass into the required space, you start to get absorbtion and re-emission effects. (eg, the view of the (bright) center of our galaxy is visible-light dim from here due to dust in the way, but you get a big radio signal)

http://astron.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/darkmatter/dm.html has much better clue than I.

Theories as to what it actually is range from the complicated to the truly wacky, but that's normal for a new question. It takes a while to figure out what question you're asking, let alone test the answers that people come up with.