September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, June 3rd, 2004 02:09 pm (UTC)
Not going fast enough. A suborbital is much easier than orbital, because of the difference in speed. On a suborbital you just have to get up there, then fall back down. For orbit you have to get up there and be going 17,000 mph sidewise so you can stay up there. All that kinetic energy has to go somewhere when you come back down. Currently the only thing we can do with it is turn it into a lot of heat.

A commercial orbital flight is certainly the holy grail, but the point of the X-Prize is just to get things going. I've heard that there will be a new X-Prize of $20 million for orbital after the sub-orbital one is claimed. And I know Rutan plans on going for orbit with an improved SS1.

There is probably some money to be made from suborbitals, however. Thrill seekers, certainly. I'd do it, given the cash. And how much would Fortune 500 CEOs pay to get to Tokyo in 2 hours?

Reply

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting