September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, January 29th, 2004 11:24 am (UTC)
Hmm. Defined as such, 'semordlinap' is a quine, yes.

There is just something forced about it. 'Semordnilap' is fairly obviously an invented word, created to describe words spelled backwards having their own (distinct) meaning. But are semordlinap quines valid if the backwards spelling must be newly defined as a word? I could take any random word, like 'random', and call it a semordlinap by the same logic that invented the word 'semordlinap': modnar. Pronunciable by English rules, sure, but does it have any meaning?

Are semantics important for well-formed quines? I'm not sure. '"Yields falsehood when quined" yields falsehood when quined' derives all of its semantic sense from its nature, but there are a lot of bad quines that follow English syntax but aren't particularly flavorful.

I agree that the dessert -> stressed and evil -> live constructions are elegant, but the word 'semordlinap' itself doesn't seem to cut it.

I would be truly staggered by a non-palindromic word that, spelled backwards, formed a different word with a synonymous or antonymous meaning. Evil -> live is vaguely there, but not quite.

Reply

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting