" Following that line of thoughts has now lead us to the point of deciding that those thoughts were never about consciousness in the first place."
We may need to go back and talk about "about". Those thoughts can't be causally downstream of consciousness (as epiphenomenon taken to be causally downstream of physics), but does that mean they can't be about consciousness? I believe a professional epiphenomenalist would play it that way.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
We may need to go back and talk about "about". Those thoughts can't be causally downstream of consciousness (as epiphenomenon taken to be causally downstream of physics), but does that mean they can't be about consciousness? I believe a professional epiphenomenalist would play it that way.