September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, February 9th, 2011 10:05 am (UTC)
Pneumatic devices are a lot cheaper than hydraulic ones and we were trying to get hydraulic/electric positioning performance at a lower cost -- what we called a "working man's robot". The compressibility of the working fluid was a major handicap in terms of accurate positioning and dynamic path control though.

There were all sorts of tradeoffs; most factory floors have 7 bar compressed air supplies which meant no dedicated compressors were needed to drive the robot unlike hydraulic devices which would usually require a power pack. Robots in food processing facilities can't use regular hydraulic fluids for fear of contamination and this was one of the target markets for our design; all it needed to drive it was a sterile filtered air source. Not requiring recirculation of working fluid was a big win in terms of plumbing, hoses, leak prevention etc. We were looking at the idea of using pneumatic actuators with a suitable low-pressure hydraulic fluid (7-10 bar) to compensate for the compressibility problem when I left the project.

If you do go to rotary actuators you can buy them off-the-shelf with angular position sensors already fitted and qualified saving you a lot of integration hassle. They can also be sealed better than cylinder actuators since there is only a rotating shaft coming out of the actuator housing rather than a sliding piston rod.

Reply

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting