September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, February 9th, 2011 04:55 am (UTC)
Yeah, I'm not expecting it to be easy. I won't be needing quite the precision of an industrial arm, thankfully. It would be nice to have, of course, that would allow for more interesting gaits and behaviors in the final hexapod.

Why were you trying to hold a cylinder static under pressure? (Iirc, there are some clever plumbing arrangements which do allow that, though they reduce the total force the cylinder can exert.) I plan on using center-closed or tandem valves, so the cylinders will be locked even when the power is off. I guess that might not work as well with squishy pneumatics?

Rotary is what I'm going to care about in the end. Existing hexapod code is all written for RC servos, so it's setting the angle of the joint directly. As you say, easier to read that anyway. I have an as5040 (http://www.austriamicrosystems.com/eng/Products/Magnetic-Encoders/Rotary-Encoders/AS5040) that I'm testing for the encoder. Cheap, fast, accurate and dust proof -- very important for the target environment. Other than having to solder up way more SMD chips than I would normally chose to deal with (that is, zero) they should work quite well once I get the mounting worked out.

Reply

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting