September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, November 18th, 2010 02:05 am (UTC)
"less radiation than flying" isn't really true, from what I've read


Where, exactly, have you read this? Because radiation doses from flying are *enormous* and the specified doses from this stuff are *miniscule*. Like at least three orders of magnitude down. Now, I freely admit that the maintained-and-designed-by-idiots bit is worrisome but if anybody is honestly saying that the doses for backscatter machines operating as designed are even remotely comparable to doses from flying, I want to know about it.

Reply

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting