September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 08:28 am (UTC)
The obstetrician judges solely on reproductive organs, likewise the botantist (there are edge cases for both, which you gloss over) not so for people in the street, and neither can you reasonably say that they're inferring about genitals, they're inferring about gender/sex and thinking about genitals from there if at all. Fertility is a proxy, but not what the arbitrary distinction actually is, even if the arbitrary distinctions and assumptions themselves inform evolutionary processes that are fundamentally concerned about fertility. By that measure, all one needs to transition is hip pads and greasy hair. But those aren't the only factors being looked at, because social pressures and evolutionary ones have built up all sorts of standards perhaps best described as gender (in the linguistic sense of attributes/classes of nouns; since certainly other measures of fitness than simply fertility are evaluated) rather than sex per se.

Reply

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting