September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 21222324
2526 27282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009 09:41 pm (UTC)
Exactly. And often it's an either/or thing - you can afford the insurance or you can afford to pay for your treatment out of pocket, but not both.

(I also think the 'vaguely construed' part is very important. I think a lot of people when thinking about pre-existing conditions think of them as very fixed and specific things, but if you're looking at it from the point of view of a company trying to weasel out of paying for something, quite a lot of pre-existing conditions have a whole host of things that *MIGHT* be related, and how can you prove one way or the other? Heck, who has the energy to get into that kind of argument? A lot of people don't, or don't even realize that they CAN argue things.)

(To be fair, I do not think all insurance companies are evil. But I think the way things are now is ridiculous. It really did relieve quite a lot of stress I didn't even know I was under when I was living in the UK and finally qualified for NHS coverage.)

Reply

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting