SRVC results details

[gfish]

If you want a breakdown of points for the 4 placing teams, they've put up a rather large PDF of the workshop presentation from Friday. It includes the actual images returned, so you can see what kind of quality we're capable of achieving. (UBC's bounding boxes are normally a bit better, but there was a bug in that part of the code.)

Comments

[arjache.livejournal.com]

Neat! It looks like the 2nd-place winner made their robot a bit too tall/unzoomable, to judge from the robot-perspective photos.

[vixyish.livejournal.com]

Interesting how a lot of the same objects were identified. (Spam, Ritz crackers.) I suppose that reflects how unique they are (product brand labels vs. how many different types of vacuum cleaners there are) and how prevalent they are in image search engines.

Why were there non-scoring objects?