1 is pretty self-explanatory, though I could argue quite a while about using this sort of system to quantify quality, but that's just me being a photographer. I do find some of their feature set for a quality photo to be very interesting (and true).
2 is pretty clear, but I'm curious as to what the final outcome desired is. Obviously, I know very little about what you've been working on.
3 loses me, 'cause I fail at this type of geekery.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
1 is pretty self-explanatory, though I could argue quite a while about using this sort of system to quantify quality, but that's just me being a photographer. I do find some of their feature set for a quality photo to be very interesting (and true).
2 is pretty clear, but I'm curious as to what the final outcome desired is. Obviously, I know very little about what you've been working on.
3 loses me, 'cause I fail at this type of geekery.