Wednesday, September 20th, 2006 04:56 pm
AP story via Houston Chronicle:
She will spend two hours on a modified Boeing 727 jet, which will soar six miles above the Earth before dropping, giving about a half-minute of weightlessness with each cycle.

AP story via CNN:
She will spend two hours on a modified Boeing aircraft, which will soar 6 miles (10 kilometers) above the earth before dropping, giving several minutes of weightlessness with each cycle.

I particularly like how the CNN version adds the metric conversion to look extra accurate while in fact being completely wrong about the basic physics of the situation.
Thursday, September 21st, 2006 12:40 am (UTC)
You should let them know. Lazy fact-checkers...
Thursday, September 21st, 2006 05:02 am (UTC)
That's just weird. Why would you deliberately change something to make it less accurate?
Thursday, September 21st, 2006 06:00 am (UTC)
It's just as possible that the AP updated the article and the Chronicle was using the later version. I just noticed that the BBC article (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/5364722.stm) contains the same error, and it doesn't cite the AP at all. It's possible the Chronicle changed the AP article, since they're a lot more likely to know what's going on with reduced gravity flights, but I don't know if they're allowed to edit AP stories like that. I'd suspect not.
Thursday, September 21st, 2006 06:48 am (UTC)
Several minutes?

... In addition to doing much better science if we'd had that kind of time, I would have tried to shed a few more 0.001-G purity points. Sheesh.
Thursday, September 21st, 2006 08:15 am (UTC)
OK, I know this is completely random, but I was at the pub on Tuesday with some friends and one said "y'know, [livejournal.com profile] spiritrover and [livejournal.com profile] opportunitygrrl should really update again!

I almost got whiplash when I turned around and said I KNEW those people!

Anyways, consider this your friendly neighbourhood heckle, via a stranger in Oxford. ;)
Thursday, September 21st, 2006 08:39 am (UTC)
Hee! That's very cool.

The thing is, that eventually the rovers are going to fail. I can't speak for [livejournal.com profile] opportunitygrrl, but I really don't want to deal with covering that in the first person -- either in terms of narrative design or emotionally. Plus, the rover journals are getting pretty oldmeme. I'd rather just let [livejournal.com profile] spiritrover fade into Internet history gracefully. I think the birthday cake was a pretty nice gracenote.
Thursday, September 21st, 2006 09:47 am (UTC)
Ooooh yeah, that would be much with the suck. I suppose you could fake an alien abduction, however. ;)

Thanks for pinging back, though!
Thursday, September 21st, 2006 03:40 pm (UTC)
Perhaps by snarking about this: http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/transformers/

(Perhaps, the blue skies and extensive cloud cover clearly visible in the shots of Mars?)

On an unrelated note: they made a feel-good movie about aerial combat in World War One. Why god, why? http://www.apple.com/trailers/mgm/flyboys/trailer/